+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 49

Thread: Finally got some K2006C numbers.. please look

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    PoolDoc's Avatar
    PoolDoc is offline Administrator Quark Inspector PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars PoolDoc 5 stars
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    11,386

    Default Re: Finally got some K2006C numbers.. please look

    You know what? I'm about sick of that PoolCalculator! (Not your fault! Not blaming you!) It's a useful tool, but it's NOT useful for the inexperienced. I saw it happen last year, and I'm seeing it happen more, this year: people using it end up chasing numbers FAR too often. It's my fault; I haven't make something better.

    But do this: download the "Bleach Calculator", created some years ago by a member here -- http://www.poolforum.com/zxq/BleachCalc262.exe -- and use it. It's much simpler. There is some sort of issue with the borates calculation, so when you need that, check with me, first.

    Anyhow, both your TA and CH are *fine* for YOUR pool. They are too low for a *concrete* pool, but that is NOT what you have.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Central NJ
    Posts
    56

    Default Re: Finally got some K2006C numbers.. please look

    Quote Originally Posted by PoolDoc View Post
    You know what? I'm about sick of that PoolCalculator! (Not your fault! Not blaming you!) It's a useful tool, but it's NOT useful for the inexperienced. I saw it happen last year, and I'm seeing it happen more, this year: people using it end up chasing numbers FAR too often. It's my fault; I haven't make something better.

    But do this: download the "Bleach Calculator", created some years ago by a member here -- http://www.poolforum.com/zxq/BleachCalc262.exe -- and use it. It's much simpler. There is some sort of issue with the borates calculation, so when you need that, check with me, first.

    Anyhow, both your TA and CH are *fine* for YOUR pool. They are too low for a *concrete* pool, but that is NOT what you have.
    Thanks, I also use the bleach calculator, but thought the 'target' ranges on pool calculator were "standard" recommendations.

    Ill keep the TA and CH where they are and just boost my cya up another click after giving the crap I added on Sunday a chance to fully incorporate itself.

    Thanks again.
    24' Round 52" (44"/12450gal) Deep Namco Morada - ClearWater 22" Sand Filter - 1.5HP (SPL) Speck Pump - Taylor K-2006C Test Kit

  3. #3
    Watermom's Avatar
    Watermom is offline SuperMod Emeritus Quark Inspector Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    9,345

    Default Re: Finally got some K2006C numbers.. please look

    I agree with Ben. Your TA and CH are fine. Pool stores love to tell you that vinyl pools need calcium; HOGWASH! Low CH in a vinyl pool is not an issue; really high CH can be but yours is not high.

    My advice (for what it's worth) is ................. GO SWIMMING!!

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Finally was able to get small test kit...here are my numbers
    By Aquapisces in forum DPD-FAS based testing
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-09-2011, 09:44 AM
  2. finally back
    By horsesaremylife1030 in forum General Interest
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-07-2011, 02:28 PM
  3. Finally got Ben's kit! First results....
    By court475 in forum DPD-FAS based testing
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-12-2006, 03:49 PM
  4. I finally tried my aquabot...
    By gonefishin in forum Pool Cleaning: Manual or Automatic
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-15-2006, 12:02 AM
  5. I think it's finally all DEAD :)
    By Sprocket in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-05-2006, 12:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts