+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 29

Thread: two-speed with solar panels

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    mas985's Avatar
    mas985 is offline Lifetime Member Whizbang Spinner mas985 3 stars mas985 3 stars mas985 3 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pleasanton, CA
    Posts
    1,423

    Default Re: two-speed with solar panels

    I deleted my original response because I realized that I could make this real simple.

    If you look at the head curve of a 3/4 HP two speed pump, you will notice that at 0 GPM it reaches a maximum head of about 20 feet or so. This means that with a pipe 20 ft in the air, no water will come out of the top, 0 GPM. There is a good chance you will burn up the pump in the process too.

    If the vacuum valve requires 2 PSI to close, then the maximum head loss possible is 15 feet (20-5). If your roof is lower than 15 ft, you may have a chance at closing the vacuum valve. If not, you are out of luck. Its that simple.

    Even if the valve does close, you need quite a bit of flow to push the air downwards to completely prime the pipe. So in reality, your are limited by much less than 15 ft.
    Last edited by mas985; 05-21-2007 at 01:12 AM. Reason: Simplified explaination
    Mark
    Hydraulics 101; Pump Ed 101; Pump/Pool Spreadsheets; Pump Run Time Study; DIY Acid Dosing; DIY Cover Roller
    18'x36' 20k plaster, MaxFlo SP2303VSP, Aqualogic PS8 SWCG, 420 sq-ft Cartridge, Solar, 6 jet spa, 1 HP jet pump, 400k BTU NG Heater

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    48

    Default Re: two-speed with solar panels

    Quote Originally Posted by mas985 View Post
    I deleted my original response because I realized that I could make this real simple.

    If you look at the head curve of a 3/4 HP two speed pump, you will notice that at 0 GPM it reaches a maximum head of about 20 feet or so. This means that with a pipe 20 ft in the air, no water will come out of the top, 0 GPM. There is a good chance you will burn up the pump in the process too.

    If the vacuum valve requires 2 PSI to close, then the maximum head loss possible is 15 feet (20-5). If your roof is lower than 15 ft, you may have a chance at closing the vacuum valve. If not, you are out of luck. Its that simple.
    I completely agree with this. 100%.

    Even if the valve does close, you need quite a bit of flow to push the air downwards to completely prime the pipe. So in reality, your are limited by much less than 15 ft.
    I see. If the flow is too low, you could end up with air permanently stuck in the pipe. This I believe. In fact, if you make the pipe wide enough, that will happen at any flow. You probably need a turbulent air-water mix to remove all the air. Which implies some minimum flow.

    But why is it bad to have air permanently stuck in the pipe? Mmmm... maybe I see now. With air stuck in the pipe, the potential energy of the water as it falls down is wasted instead of contributing to the suction. So you don't get the pressure reduction at the top. Ah ha.

    So that's the issue. You want to get rid of the air from the pipe to make the system work more efficiently. And that requires the high speed. Now I believe you.

    However, if the pressure near the top is relatively low, then you don't care, because in any case you never want to have negative pressure. So the 1-speed pump works fine, even with air in the pipe, as long as it barely makes it over the hump. Which is probably not a healthy situation.

    I think maybe I will stick to my 3/4 HP pump!

    Thanks again!
    30'x16' (irregular) indoor gunite/plaster pool, 10k gal,
    Autopilot DLG-220 with SC-48 cell, 3/4 HP recirc pump,
    solar panels, heat exchanger from 200 kBTU/hour Viessmann boiler

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Solar Panels
    By dhage in forum In-Ground Pool Construction and Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-18-2012, 11:57 PM
  2. Solar Panels and Solar Covers
    By FlowerPool in forum Intex-type Pool Setup & Operations
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-22-2012, 07:12 PM
  3. Solar Cover Thickness, Reel Quality, Solar Panels
    By vector13 in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-20-2012, 02:45 PM
  4. Solar Panels Q?
    By shanode in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 06:04 PM
  5. Solar Panels. Which one????
    By Dannyo in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 11:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts