+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Same Taylor Test Kit K-2005 - (Different Results)

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    7

    Default Re: Same Taylor Test Kit K-2005 - (Different Results)

    Hello Again....... I have a Jandy system now. Prior to that I had a Chlromatic. After 11 years I needed another cell Chlormatic was out of business, so I had to get a complete Jandy system. My original aaaand still being used equipment is an American Products Ultra Flow Pump & a 22 Inch Eclipse sand filter. Sand was changed when the new Jandy was installed. It looked as good as the new sand. None of my equipment has ever been rained on, or had sunlight hit it. It is all enclosed in a special room I designed for it when I built my home. I have always had a pool cleaner who tests the water weekly. The water reports I got was just to see that he was keeping my water balanced. I'm sure the PH has not always been in range, but from the looks of the pool, it's been pretty close for 14 years.
    The Algea Dust is just that. You touch it underwater a disappears into the water till it settles again. I have seen posts about algae dust on the web before. Very hard to get it out of the system. My PH is hard to get below 7.9 and the alkalinity wants to keep dropping. When I do add acid, I walk it in small amounts. Any idea there?
    I live in Destin.

  2. #2
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: Same Taylor Test Kit K-2005 - (Different Results)

    So much misinformation, where to being!?!?!?!?!
    Algae dust you are describing sounds like mustard algae and is caused by not having a high enough FC level in the water. Once you get it you are correct that it is hard to get rid of.
    Quote Originally Posted by wapate View Post
    I'm sure the PH has not always been in range, but from the looks of the pool, it's been pretty close for 14 years.
    <facepalm>
    The calcium scale "cake icing" is a water balance issue. Peroid. You cannot tell if the water has reached scaling conditions by looking at it AND YOU CANNOT TELL THE pH OF THE WATER BY LOOKING AT IT, YOU HAVE TO TEST IT! PERIOD!
    Both of these together are a good reason to fire the pool guy and start doing it yourself since the fact that you have had these problems and
    Quote Originally Posted by wapate View Post
    My PH is hard to get below 7.9 and the alkalinity wants to keep dropping. When I do add acid, I walk it in small amounts. Any idea there?
    I live in Destin.
    As far as walking acid to lower pH vs slugging acid to lower TA, it's a myth that persists in the pool industry even though it has been thoroughly debunked many years ago! (The linked article is from 1995!)

    IF you are having problems keeping the pH down in a salt pool lower the TA. The main cause of pH rise in a salt pool is from outgassing of CO2. Keep your TA at about 70 (and adjust calcium if needed to maintain your calcium saturation index). Keeping your CYA at the recommened maximum (for Jandy that is 75 ppm) will also help by limiting cell on time. You then want to maintain the FC level at a minimum of 5% of your CYA (so keep it no lower than 4 ppm at all times).
    When you lower the pH (it makes no difference at all if you walk the acid or slug it other than potential damage you can do to the pool by slugging it) don't lower it below about 7.6 and wait for it to climb above 7.8 before lowering it again. The lower you put the TA the faster CO2 will gas off.
    Adding acid will lower BOTH pH and TA but it will lower pH much faster than it lowers TA, Depending on the TA of your fill water you might need to bump up the TA from time to time with baking soda (in Florda that is doubtful) but you want to keep your TA at 70 ppm and don't worry about raising it until it drops BELOW 60 ppm.
    To lower your TA it is a process, you drop the pH to 7.0 (and not lower to prevent damage to pool surfaces and equipment) and then allow the CO2 that has been created from the bicarbonate (TA) in your water to gas off. The act of adding the acid lowers the TA, allowing the CO2 to gas off brings the pH up without causing the TA to rise again. Aeration of the water will speed up the outgassing of CO2. There is a sticky in the forum with full instructions on how to lower TA if you need to do so.

    Once you get your water in better balance and are able to keep it there you might consider adding 50 ppm borate to your water to introduce a secondary pH buffer (in addition to the bicarbonate buffer we call TA) that effectively holds the pH at around 7.7 to 7.8 for a longer time than without borate. As an added plus the borate has algaestatic action and will help keep the mustard algae at bay.

    Bottom line is this, just because you have owned a pool for 14 years does not mean you have been caring for it properly (and it is not your fault because there is SO much misinformation that the pool industry keeps repeating, some of it because of ignorance and some of it to keep chemical sales at a maximum.
    Now would be the time to learn what to do so you do not repeat the mistakes of the past (and if it were my pool the first step would be to fire the pool guy and take contorl of the pool myself!)
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    7

    Default Re: Same Taylor Test Kit K-2005 - (Different Results)

    First, I want to thank you for starting me in the right direction. I have lowered my PH gradually, now 7.7, the TA (96 adjusted) has not changed much, so I'm heading the right way. My FC is 3, my CYA is 30 & my CA is 150. If I understand the S.I. correctly, that puts me close to 0. My goal now is to maintain that.
    Wanted to clarify something I said earlier. When I stated my pool looked good to be 14 years old, I was not referring to the PH looking good. What I meant to say was that for my pool to look like it was plastered yesterday, and the fact I have never had a build-up in my SWG, the chemicals must have been close to correct. I've never seen a post claiming a pool can be way out of balance and have a finish like I do after 14 years.
    Since I am now able to get much need help managing my pool and having an understanding more about my test kit........ The Pool Cleaner is history. Wish I had know then what I know now.
    Thank You Again.........

  4. #4
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: Same Taylor Test Kit K-2005 - (Different Results)

    Quote Originally Posted by wapate View Post
    First, I want to thank you for starting me in the right direction. I have lowered my PH gradually, now 7.7, the TA (96 adjusted) has not changed much, so I'm heading the right way. My FC is 3, my CYA is 30 & my CA is 150. If I understand the S.I. correctly, that puts me close to 0. My goal now is to maintain that.

    CYA is too low calcium is too low for a plaster pool Adjusted TA is hot very useful, no matter what the Taylor book says!
    Wanted to clarify something I said earlier. When I stated my pool looked good to be 14 years old, I was not referring to the PH looking good. What I meant to say was that for my pool to look like it was plastered yesterday, and the fact I have never had a build-up in my SWG, the chemicals must have been close to correct. I've never seen a post claiming a pool can be way out of balance and have a finish like I do after 14 years.

    Thank You Again.........
    If your calcium has always been that low it probably means that you have not had scaling conditions but had aggresive water, which would also explain no calcium buildup in the cell. Also the Langelier SI that you are probably using if you are using the Taylor WaterGram is not really applicable to open systems like swimming pools, it was desgined to predict scale buildup in closed boiler system.

    IF you want to get your water balanced then:
    1. get your CYA up to 75-80 ppm and keep it there
    2. make sure the FC never drops below 4 ppm
    3. lower the TA to 70 ppm
    4. Keep your CH between 350 and 450 ppm
    4. Keep the pH ABOVE 7.5 and BELOW 8.0
    This will keep your Calcium Saturation index within an acceptable range for water temperatures from abut 72 degrees to 90 degress

    If you decide to add 50 ppm borate for the secondary pH buffer (it tends to keep the pH around 7.7-7.8 for a longer period of time than without borate) and for the algaestatic properties (a good idea since you have had mustard algae) then keep the CH closer to 450 instead of 350 to maintain the calcium saturation index.
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. taylor- 2005 vs taylor-2006
    By axell in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 11:05 PM
  2. Taylor K-2005 vs. OTO test
    By famousdavis in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-27-2011, 11:25 PM
  3. Taylor K-2005 vs. K-2006
    By myLABSpool in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-28-2010, 08:16 AM
  4. Taylor test kit first results
    By JazzMan2010 in forum Salt Generators (SWCG) & other Chlorine Feeders
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-03-2010, 02:07 PM
  5. Help !!!!!!!! Please taylor Test kit k-2005
    By Cardynall-Synn in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-06-2007, 11:44 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts