Quote Originally Posted by CarlD View Post
Evan,
I'm not surprised you have had fewer problems with SWG pools. But remember, people who have found their way to PoolForum learn how to avoid those problems through education. Since I began as a newbie here, I've had two water problems in 8 years, both quickly solved--and not repeated.

It's a toss-up--do you educate yourself or toss out $$$ to compensate? I agree: An SWG is about the best and smartest way to spend money compensating for lack of knowledge.
I have to disagree with this. Lack of knowledge and a SWG is a recipe for water disaster. The thing just won't work properly and when that happens most people will, after a short time, get it right (or finally sit down and read the manual!). SWG's are pretty unforgiving in that area! A SWG does NOT replace the need to properly learn how to care for your pool. If anything, my customers with SWG's know more about pool care then the ones without because they have to learn about CYA, why TDS is a bogus measurement, proper calcium balance, etc. from the beginning or their salt system will just not work properly! Someone with a salt system could probably be switched to liquid chlorine and 'get it' much easier than someone who is used to putting trichlor in a feeder! It is a 'high tech' solution to chlorination and that alone, IMHO, makes the customer a bit more eager to learn about their pool. The ones that don't want to bother usually pay a service to do the work for them so we are not talking about them. (I'm going to stop now before I go into one of my rants about pool owner indifference and false economy. You know, the ones who try and save a few pennies and end up wasting dollors--like when they buy that gallon of cheap quat algaecide becasue it is only a few dollars but it actually cost more per ounce then the expensive one (polyquat) and then they need the defoamer and clarifier with it because of it's side effects! I see this all the time! Whoops, guess I DID rant!)
You know MY opinion on tri-chlor--it's best if used on new hard-surfaced pools while they cure. Otherwise it's usually wise to avoid using it.

If $$ is tight, education is the BEST way to compensate--that's generally speaking.
If money is tight then a pool ususally is NOT the best investment! When you consider that SWGs have been in use in Australia since the 60's and there they are more the norm rather than the exception it makes you wonder why they took so long to catch on here in the states. Carl, I wish someone would give you one so you could live with one then tell you you had to stop using it and go back to bleach. I think you would sing a very different tune!

Don't get me wrong. Liquid chlorine is, IMHO, one of the best ways to manually chloriinate a pool but the popularity of inline feeders and trichlor show that people want a way to automate this task. SWG's are the way to go if you look at the chlorination automation methods available, IMHO (at least for resisential use)! Much more dependable and much eaier than using liquid chlorine and a peristaltic pump! Far fewer problems than using an inline feeder with trichlor (especially with a cartridge filter).