1. Running pumps in parallel is tricky. It can be done, but all sorts of problems can arise. Worse, it's unlikely to be efficient.
2. Pump output is non-linear: depending on dynamic head pressure (resistance to flow), two pumps at 1,000 rpm might produce a small fraction of the flow (GPM) of a single pump at 2,000 rpm.
3. Fully valid considerations of energy efficiency consider not only the energy cost of operation, but also the energy cost of manufacture and installation. (This is why Al Gore's claims to be 'green' are so bogus -- he may have bought 'energy credits' for the cost of OPERATING his 10,000 sft house, but there's no way he's bought sufficient credits to offset the energy-cost to manufacture and construct that monstrosity! Like many environmental crusaders, he's all "Do as I say, not as I do!".)
From an environmental point of view, once the energy cost of manufacture is considered, you'll probably more efficient with a single old 1-speed pump, than with (2) VSR pumps installed in parallel. (Of course, a SINGLE variable speed pump will be more efficient than either.)
4. Regarding your SWCG -- most salt systems use a flow switch that is dependent on the 'shape' of the flow into the cell. Often, the switch can be arranged to activate properly by piping the upstream side of the cell with 1.5" pipe, instead of 2" pipe. Depending on your pool's layout, it may be necessary to install a bypass on the cell, with a check valve having a 1 lb spring on the bypass. This allows 100% of flow to go through the cell, at low flow, but allows the bypass to open at higher flow rates.
Bookmarks