I'm sorry, Jake, but I have zero interest in helping you sock-it-to-the-HOA.
By FAR the largest risk to the kids in your neighborhood, is a risk of drowning, not suction entrapment. The VGB is a perfect example of the sort of monstrous law that's created when a horrible tragedy occurs, and people run around say, "There ought to be a law . . ." Nobody, including the CPSC, has determined how to comply, because the law was all impulse and hardly any engineering.
If you simply wanted to save lives, you could save 10x the lives VGB will save, simply by diverting the money the CPSC alone (and that's a tiny, tiny fraction of the money) spent on VGB so far to neo-natal care funds for low income moms. But, again, it's not about saving the most lives possible, it's about scratching an emotional itch created by a terrible -- but extremely low-risk and improbable -- event.
Given that the risk of drowning is far, far greater than the risk of entrapment, and given that you are so concerned with "the safety of the children swimming at our neighborhood pool", may I suggest that you volunteer to guard the pool for free, on your off days and hours? That would contribute far more to their safety, then this apparently long-standing vendetta you are pursuing against the HOA.
I have no love for HOA's and there are many, many accounts of the petty tyrants these organizations attract. But, if you want to declare war on yours, I suggest an attorney's office is a much better place for such a thing then here.
Bookmarks