Sounds good to me -- if anyone knows of a legal or ethical reason why this shouldn't be done, please post. I'll spin this topic off into a separate thread if necessary.

I may be mistaken -- and I'm open to correction -- I don't see that pool owners are party to the Lowry monopoly, from either a legal or ethical point of view. So until corrected, my feeling is, if anyone can find a way around that monopoly that's not illegal, I'm all for it.