with a pool that gets all-day sun, a solar cover is very helpful in decreasing the chlorine demand. my cover doesn't do a whole lot to warm the pool in the summer - in fact it warms up more during the day with the cover off - but it probably cuts my chlorine usage in half. (for the record, the solar cover holds in the heat at night far better than it generates heat during the day. which has nothing to do with what you asked...)
anyhow, when i was using 6% bleach in my 24,000 gallon pool, with the solar cover on when the pool wasn't in use, i was putting in 48 oz. each night and that would keep me at a pretty consistent 2 - 2.5 PPM. i had to use twice that over periods when i got too lazy to haul the cover on and off.
The type of cover seems to make a difference with clear covers not doing much to block the UV in sunlight while blue covers seem to block some if it (though not all). So for protecting the chlorine in the water, the blue covers do a better job. Even better for chlorine protection is an opaque cover, but then you don't get much heating from the sun during the day.
Is this an educated guess or a result of experience / experiment? I remember this was discussed last year (different forum) and I decided to replace my blue solar cover with a clear one -- it's on the pool now but not enough time has elapsed for me to be able to draw any meaningful comparisons.
16'x29' free-form 14K gal IG gunite pool; SWCG & sodium hypochlorite 8.25%; Hayward SwimClear C4025 cartridge filter; Hayward SP3202VSP TriStar Variable Speed Pool Pump; custom test kit based on Taylor K-2006C; city; PF:8.6
I've always noticed I used less chlorine with the cover on. I don't know how much is due to UV blocking and how much is due to inhibiting evaporation. I don't KNOW that clear covers don't block UV. Clearly auto glass does--ask anyone with photochromatic eyeglasses--they only change in direct sunlight (the old glass lenses changed in the car--the new plastic ones don't). Blue PROBABLY blocks UV better, but, again, I don't know.
Clear allows more light to reach the water, heating more, but the greenhouse effect of both is important, as is the insulation qualities.
But I've also found that cheaper covers fall apart after 3 seasons, but the expensive ones always go a 3 full years, and the warranty NEVER covers what fails--just the seams....So I now go with the cheaper ones, which are also easier to carry on and off when the season begins and ends.
Carl
Multiple reports from users of clear and blue covers. I have a mostly opaque cover myself so no surprise that it cuts down on daily chlorine use. There were at least two separate pool owners who had tried both types of cover -- clear and blue -- and both found that clear did not significantly lower chlorine demand but that the blue one did. Other people using only one type of cover also reported not much change with the cover on vs. off with clear, but noticing a difference with the blue cover.
See this post for one example (you were on that thread so might remember this post). This post is another. This post is another. It is consistently reported that the covers that let more light in, so are more clear, heat the pool more during the day (which makes sense). So the tradeoff is between daytime heating vs. chlorine loss. The ideal cover would block UV but let infrared and visible light through, but that doesn't seem to exist.
I had initially hoped that the clear cover would block UV but let infrared or visible through, but that apparently is not the case. Plastic doesn't behave the same as regular glass which does block a lot of UV (quartz glass lets UV through).
Last edited by chem geek; 06-23-2010 at 12:51 PM.
I haven't had time to fool with the pool - but the pump impeller was trashed. $140 of parts from Leslie's(only place locally that had Hayward parts) and 2 packs of HTH later the pool's somewhat back in shape - algae is starting to rear its ugly head but the pool was scrubbed down yesterday.
Levels:
Free Cl: 2ppm, I had it at 3.5 yesterday
TA: 120ppm
CH: 350ppm
pH: 7.5
CYA: 65ppm
I told my old boss to dump in 84oz of bleach per the TFP calc. His next purchase will be one of those blue solar covers - but I'm trying to get him to invest in an Liquidator.![]()
CH:350?, CYA:65? FC: 2?You should now ONLY be using bleach or liquid chlorine.
HTH (cal-hypo powder) will rapidly push your CH over 400--the max recommended for plaster/concrete pools.
Tri-Chlor tabs and Di-Chlor powder will push your CYA up which is ALREADY very high at 65.
FC is far too low and NOW needs to be between 5 and 10ppm just for maintenance.
You are still within normal, recommended ranges for everything (but your low FC). But I would STRONGLY recommend you stick with bleach/LC given your CH and CYA numbers.
Carl
Bookmarks