+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    12806 Gaffney Rd
    Posts
    5

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    If you hunt around, I am sure you can find a much better price than that for bleach. Costco was running about half that price if you bought a whole case the last time I looked, and WalMart around here is only a little more than Costco.
    -- Trouble Free Pool website administrator --
    ------ note added by PoolForum staff -------

  2. #2
    beavis is offline Violated AUP (forum rules!) by spamming, SEO, trying to sell stuff, being an online jerk, etc. beavis 0
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    6

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    actually, I got the price from the costco website here

  3. #3
    ScottS is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst ScottS 0
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Covington, LA.
    Posts
    104

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    I do have to agree with you somewhat as I was calculating this the other day. At WalMart I get a 182oz jug for $2.54 so that is definitely less than what you are finding.

    However it has been a royal PITA purchasing the WalMart brand bleach. Half of the jugs I grab have busted seals on the top. So now when I purchase I end up having to open each jug before I put it in the basket. This is time consuming and frustrating at the same time. Now, the seals that are intact do not want to remove with the useless "pull tab". I end up cutting them off. It just seems to be much more of a hassle than it used to be.

    On the other hand some of the other methods may seem cheaper initially but it's the side effects they cause that make it more costly and causes one to chase his tail. For instance the trichlor pucks are acidic plus they add stabilizer. Neither is a great option for me as my pH is constant and doesn't swing due to the fact that I chlorinate with bleach.

    I guess I got off track a bit however it's all related. The cost may have gone up but I still think it allows maintaining crystal clear water very easily

    -Scott

  4. #4
    aylad's Avatar
    aylad is offline SuperMod Emeritus Burfle Ringer aylad 4 stars aylad 4 stars aylad 4 stars aylad 4 stars aylad 4 stars aylad 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Northwest Lousiana
    Posts
    4,757

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    Quote Originally Posted by ScottS View Post
    . Now, the seals that are intact do not want to remove with the useless "pull tab". I end up cutting them off. It just seems to be much more of a hassle than it used to be.
    I agree with you there--in fact, I've started leaving a butter knife outside near the pool just for that purpose!! Didn't notice it so much last summer, but then again our WalMarts had a hard time keeping the larger size jugs in stock.

    Still worth it, though, once you get your water where you want it, it's really the easiest way to keep it there, short of SWG!

    Janet

  5. #5
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    Fortunately, I am able to get 12.5% chlorinating liquid from my local pool store for $3.00 per gallon (before tax) which actually went down in price from last year and is equivalent to $1.11 for a 96-ounce (3/4 gallon) jug of bleach. They also reuse the bottles which is better than recycling.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    90

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    Beavis,

    I came to the same conclusion several years ago. It is also too inconvienant to buy bleach so often.

    I bought 40 pounds of trichor at cosco for $89 and that will last all swim season. I shock with bleach and I open my pool using bleach.

    I always open my pool to 0 cya every season, so I am not concerned about adding cya through the season.

  7. #7
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: Bleach is no longer cost-effective???

    If one has a shorter swim season, a smaller pool, a sand filter backwashed weekly, summer rains with overflow, winter rains or other reduction of CYA over the winter, then one can sometimes get enough water dilution to manage using Trichlor pucks/tabs.

    For every 10 ppm Free Chlorine (FC) added by Trichlor, it also increases Cyanuric Acid (CYA) by 6 ppm. Even with a low 1 ppm FC per day chlorine usage, after 6 months this is over 100 ppm CYA if there is no water dilution. So this wouldn't work very well for those with cartridge filters that don't get backwashed, dry summers with no rain, larger pools, and longer swim seasons. My pool falls under most of those criteria (cartridge filter so no backwashing, dry summers with almost no rain, 16,000 gallon pool, 7-month swim season).

    Every situation is different, and BBB is about understanding what is going on and doing what is appropriate for YOU armed with information and knowledge to make an informed decision.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Need some help determining most cost-effective sanitizing option
    By az_13 in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-29-2012, 09:20 PM
  2. Bleach vs pucks effective chlorine.......
    By chrisexv6 in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-09-2008, 02:06 PM
  3. Cost of SWCG vs Bleach - revisited
    By larry2338 in forum Salt Generators (SWCG) & other Chlorine Feeders
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 06:30 PM
  4. Na di-chlor vs bleach cost
    By halds in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-06-2006, 09:41 PM
  5. what would be more cost effective?
    By fog80 in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-08-2006, 11:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts