Richard ,
Thanks for your reply.
In that I have city water, not well or spring water would the 1.4 calculation still hold true? Would it be good enough to do a rough estimate, then oversize the softener?
Rick
Richard ,
Thanks for your reply.
In that I have city water, not well or spring water would the 1.4 calculation still hold true? Would it be good enough to do a rough estimate, then oversize the softener?
Rick
Perhaps, but if you have a water quality report from your city (check online; they often post them there) then you can probably find both Calcium Hardness and Total Hardness listed separately and usually if only one is listed it's Total Hardness. I have found from my own testing that the numbers in the water quality report match what I measure at the tap.
With something as important as properly sizing the water softener, I would either use the water quality report data or get a real Total Hardness test. The factor of 1.4 is a nice rough estimate, but it could be totally off depending on your specific water situation since it's dependent on the kind of rocks the water has filtered through.
Richard
Thanks Richard,
I looked in the City web site and found drinking water report. Ca hardness 41.5 ppm, Mg hardness 8.8ppm and Ca/Mg hardness 140. They also gave a Total Hardness as CaCo3 of 168. I am assuming I should use the Ca/Mg Figure for determining the size of the H20 softerner? I promise this is the last time I will bother you about this.
Rick
I don't know how your water softener is spec'd so I can't answer that question. That is, I don't know if they measure their capacity in calcium carbonate (CaCO3) equivalent. If they do, then 168 ppm (mg/l) would be the number to use, but be careful since the water softener spec might use a different scale such as "grains" for hardness.
Richard
Bookmarks