Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: 220 vs. 110v SWG

Threaded View

  1. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Downingtown, PA
    Posts
    27

    Default Re: 220 vs. 110v SWG

    Quote Originally Posted by tonyl View Post
    Don's right about most people using 220V but actually, it's not cheaper.
    P(watts) = E(voltage)X I (amps). By doubling the voltage the amperage draw is halved, but the watts will be constant whether 220 or 110.

    The cost is the same.
    Disagree that the cost is the same! 220v pumps are usually more efficient (and cheaper to run) since the motor amps are less which means less heat is generated in the motor windings-also the starting amps are much less. Heat is wasted electricity. There is a noticeable difference with 220v pumps running cooler and they are more efficient. The new Pentair permanent magnet motors are even more efficient based on the motive power method used in the motor's permanent magnet rotor. Ever wonder why your AC, clothes dryer or oven is always at 220v???

    When you start using 1hp pumps or larger, that little bit of heat and lower motor efficiency results in higher electric bills and I am not talking chump change, but tens of dollars per month, especially up in the north where residential kwh are in the $0.15 kwh range with a pool pump running 10-12 hr per day, 30days a month.
    Last edited by donaldm823; 11-24-2007 at 01:24 PM.
    Don
    30,000 gal concrete pool -- Autopilot SWG
    Using BBB for chemistry -- Using LaMotte ColorQ for testing

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-08-2013, 05:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts