I always close with poly. No algae on the floor but LOTS of black/brown soot/dirt/pollen. And clear water. Just comes with living in NJ. Even cloths in closets get covered in dust fairly rapidly. The Blue Dolphin gets it with 2 or 3 cycles.
I always close with poly. No algae on the floor but LOTS of black/brown soot/dirt/pollen. And clear water. Just comes with living in NJ. Even cloths in closets get covered in dust fairly rapidly. The Blue Dolphin gets it with 2 or 3 cycles.
Carl
I have never closed without. I'm too scared at what I would find.....
Beats driving to the lake!
18'x33'x52" AG oval, hard plumbed system, 22" Pentair Meteor Filter 1.5hp pump, Goldline SWCG System, 2/4x20 SolarBear Panels, Biltmore Steps - 16x14' composite deck, Pool Rover Jr
This may be a testament to how a Cl shock will kill your Poly: I closed last fall with a double dose (half gal. in 20K of water) and then a shock, and while I can see the bottom in the four foot end, the deep end is dense green. I also use only a mesh leaf net as a cover.
Note this post where a chemist at Buckman Laboratories gives the recommended closing procedure which shocks with chlorine first, then lets the chlorine level drop before adding PolyQuat.
Richard
OK, here's how I do it and EVERY season I open to clear water. I take into account that the PolyQuat in large amounts causes the FC level to collapse. But I don't do this until the water is AT MOST in the low 60's, colder is better.
1) shock the pool
2) Add 1 quart of polyquat.
3) Wait 24 hours for the chlorine to drop.
4) Shock it up again.
5) Close
Yes, it's really all it takes.
Carl
I found it interesting that the CYA was at 0
Wondering if the algae ate it last fall and then froze and dropped to the bottom.
My CYA dropped from about 40 to 25 over the winter...but I had lot of dilution from rain and snowmelt
Carl
Right, Richard, very familiar with that post and knew about the nullifying effects at higher concentrations. Thanks for the info. My pool's not at my primary residence tho, so I didn't have time to wait for Cl levels to drop. Just the weekend.
But I have a follow-up to that referring to your comment about the 'heavy molecular weight' of the Polyquat and another, as yet unresolved controversy concerning it. Some here say that a DE filteration system will filter out the Polyquat, I remain unconvinced. Do you think, given its higher weight this is a concern? I don't have a bypass, or circulate-only mode on my Hayward EC-65, so it's a real concern for me.
I've sent an E-mail to my contact at Buckman Laboratories that makes PolyQuat. I'll let you know what they say but I suspect that the PolyQuat polymer, though long-chain and viscous, is not 5 microns in size and that's about the smallest that a DE filter can capture (I believe -- 10 microns is what usually is quoted for "typical"). I'll let you know what I find out.
Richard
Here's the response I got from Dr. McNeel (with some definition comments of mine in brackets):
The molecular weight of PolyQuat is in the low thousands (~3000-5000 daltons [each polymer unit has a molecular weight of 253.17 as seen in this post so the polymer has roughly 12-20 units and each unit is very roughly 0.01 microns in length], so an UNCHARGED filter is not going to remove it from solution, no matter how small its effective pore size may be. However, an anionic [negatively charged] surface (such as an cation exchange resin) will definitely remove PolyQuat from the water. In fact, PolyQuat will bind so tightly to a polystyrene-based strong-cation exchange resin that even concentrated hydrochloric acid will not displace it from the resin.
Diatomaceous earth and other silica-based structures will have a net cationic [positive] charge on the surface at neutral or acidic pH levels and hence will not tend to bind PolyQuat too much; however, if the pH is sufficiently high, the surface can become anionic [negative]. I don't think that the pH levels normally found in pools will be sufficiently high to be a problem for PolyQuat. Studies have been carried out in the past with sand filters (another silica-based filter medium), and PolyQuat loss on the filter medium was not found to be a problem.
It is interesting to note that if one were to use a water softener (cationic exchange resin) to try and reduce Calcium Hardness, one had better not have any residual PolyQuat in their water or else their water softener will essentially be ruined.
Richard
Last edited by chem geek; 05-14-2007 at 09:04 PM.
Bookmarks