+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Polyquat or not ?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Duanesburg, NY
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by chem geek View Post
    Note this post where a chemist at Buckman Laboratories gives the recommended closing procedure which shocks with chlorine first, then lets the chlorine level drop before adding PolyQuat.

    Richard
    Right, Richard, very familiar with that post and knew about the nullifying effects at higher concentrations. Thanks for the info. My pool's not at my primary residence tho, so I didn't have time to wait for Cl levels to drop. Just the weekend.

    But I have a follow-up to that referring to your comment about the 'heavy molecular weight' of the Polyquat and another, as yet unresolved controversy concerning it. Some here say that a DE filteration system will filter out the Polyquat, I remain unconvinced. Do you think, given its higher weight this is a concern? I don't have a bypass, or circulate-only mode on my Hayward EC-65, so it's a real concern for me.

  2. #12
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    I've sent an E-mail to my contact at Buckman Laboratories that makes PolyQuat. I'll let you know what they say but I suspect that the PolyQuat polymer, though long-chain and viscous, is not 5 microns in size and that's about the smallest that a DE filter can capture (I believe -- 10 microns is what usually is quoted for "typical"). I'll let you know what I find out.

    Richard

  3. #13
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Here's the response I got from Dr. McNeel (with some definition comments of mine in brackets):

    The molecular weight of PolyQuat is in the low thousands (~3000-5000 daltons [each polymer unit has a molecular weight of 253.17 as seen in this post so the polymer has roughly 12-20 units and each unit is very roughly 0.01 microns in length], so an UNCHARGED filter is not going to remove it from solution, no matter how small its effective pore size may be. However, an anionic [negatively charged] surface (such as an cation exchange resin) will definitely remove PolyQuat from the water. In fact, PolyQuat will bind so tightly to a polystyrene-based strong-cation exchange resin that even concentrated hydrochloric acid will not displace it from the resin.

    Diatomaceous earth and other silica-based structures will have a net cationic
    [positive] charge on the surface at neutral or acidic pH levels and hence will not tend to bind PolyQuat too much; however, if the pH is sufficiently high, the surface can become anionic [negative]. I don't think that the pH levels normally found in pools will be sufficiently high to be a problem for PolyQuat. Studies have been carried out in the past with sand filters (another silica-based filter medium), and PolyQuat loss on the filter medium was not found to be a problem.

    It is interesting to note that if one were to use a water softener (cationic exchange resin) to try and reduce Calcium Hardness, one had better not have any residual PolyQuat in their water or else their water softener will essentially be ruined.

    Richard
    Last edited by chem geek; 05-14-2007 at 09:04 PM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Duanesburg, NY
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Good to know, thanks.
    When I close this fall (shudder) I'll try to allocate more time to do it right.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Connecticut.
    Posts
    115

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    I have to ask (sorry to resurrect an old thread)....

    I have a mesh safety cover on my vinyl IG pool. Closing it consists of shocking to high FC (15-20), adding PQ and letting it circ for 24 hours, then covering the pool.

    Every year, I open and the water is clear but the bottom of the pool is a mess with algae. Granted it doesnt take long to get rid of it (a couple vacuum to waste sessions and its gone), but I was wondering if there is a way to avoid it.

    The only thing I can think of is that the mesh is allowing too much sun thru. I wanted to open it earlier than normal this year but current projects forced me to open on Memorial Day weekend. Is my best solution just to open earlier next time?

    Thanks!
    -Chris

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Duanesburg, NY
    Posts
    221

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    I'll wager that it's not algae, but some other kind sediment you're seeing.
    I think if it was algae the water wouldn't be clear. The algae would still be alive and not dead on the bottom.

    If you use a mesh cover (as I do too) expect all manner of stuff to blow in, like tree pollen, etc.
    But how does your water stay clear when you use basically the same technique as I do, and mine is (was) pea soup.


    Chuck

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Connecticut.
    Posts
    115

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Thats a very good question And I couldnt believe it with my own eyes, but it was definitely clear (you could even see the main drain in the deep end). Maybe we had so much extra rain water that it caused enough dilution to remain clear? Dunno. We did have an awful lot of rain in April.

    I suppose what was on the bottom could have been some sediment, but it was coming out green and slimy whatever it was, and there was a lot of it. I just assumed algae because it looked like a dark green. Shocked the pool for about 2 days, vacuumed to waste and 90% of it went away, I brushed the rest towards the main drain (aka "lazy mans vacuum") and am waiting for the water to completely clear up again (just a little cloudy towards the deep end, clear in the rest of the pool). All in all took 4 days from open to swimmable. Id like to see it down to 2, because Im lazy that way

  8. #18
    Rbrenton is offline ** No working email address ** Rbrenton 0
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    .
    Posts
    12

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Hello all, sorry to open up an older thread, but I too open up a NJ pool to pea soup every year using a mesh cover. A friend insists that their pool is crystal clear in the spring because they use a solid tarp under the mesh which is designed to use the mesh cover's anchors.

    I can't see how this would impact green algea, but I don't know what chemicals are used by their closing company. Mine apparently doesn't do much, but I'm never around when they show up in early October.

    Does anyone have an opinion on what this solid layer is capable of?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    140

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rbrenton View Post
    Hello all, sorry to open up an older thread, but I too open up a NJ pool to pea soup every year using a mesh cover. A friend insists that their pool is crystal clear in the spring because they use a solid tarp under the mesh which is designed to use the mesh cover's anchors.

    I can't see how this would impact green algea, but I don't know what chemicals are used by their closing company. Mine apparently doesn't do much, but I'm never around when they show up in early October.

    Does anyone have an opinion on what this solid layer is capable of?
    We also have a mesh cover and opened to a crystal clear pool. The 2 things we did were 1st: we opened in early May before the water had a chance to heat up too much (we are in West Michigan). And 2nd: we used a Keeper Klean on the water which prevented sunlight from getting in. http://www.poolproducts.com/-c-FCATHPIKKC-FNM-92.htm

    I'm not sure which one did the most good, or maybe a combo of both, but from now on we'll always use this method.
    Why BBB? Because money can't buy happiness, but saving it sure can!

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    63

    Default Re: Polyquat or not ?

    Has anyone been told to use an enzyme called "pool magic" at closing to prevent algae growth? My neighbor uses it and he said a few pool stores recommend it in addition to algaecide.

    I was only planning on shocking with liquid followed by polyquat before I blew out the lines and covered. Any thoughts or experience on using or not using pool magic at closing? Or if I'm using Polyquat is that enough?

    FYI I'm using a mesh cover on a 24K gal vinyl pool in ROC NY.

    Thanks
    Andy

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Where to Buy PolyQuat 60?
    By b2001 in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 06-13-2010, 09:28 AM
  2. polyquat
    By hannadock in forum Pool Chemicals & Pool Water Problems
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-11-2008, 11:53 AM
  3. How to use Polyquat
    By CTIGuy in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-08-2007, 01:28 PM
  4. PolyQuat??
    By Sam_I_am in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-29-2007, 09:45 PM
  5. polyquat
    By mikemedic in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 08:40 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts