+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: To Shock ----- or NOT

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Jakebear is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst Jakebear 0
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    76

    Question To Shock ----- or NOT

    Argument settling time for all the GURUs.

    MSO (My Significant Other) says there is no reason to shock this spring.

    He has been throwing the Aquabot in all winter (closed in October) and kept the pool clean and the FC has never dropped below 3.5 all winter. The Water Temp is still 48 and we will not start filtering and circulating for another week or 2.

    BBB method.

    Current numbers are (all results by my K-2006 kit and warmed to 70 deg F):

    pH 7.4
    FCl 3.8
    CCl 0.0
    CYA ~30
    TA 70
    CH 140
    NO ALGAE
    Water Clear (but not sparkling)
    Loop Lok Cover (mesh) still in place.

    Please Help ---- Hope to hear from all with different perspective on the issue.
    27038 Gallon InGround, Vinyl, DE filter.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    395

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    I agree with him! The only reason to shock is if you have combined chlorine. You free chlorine looks good with no combined chlorine. You might want to throw in some baking soda to raise the TA and make the water sparkle more.

  3. #3
    nater is offline Registered+ Weir Watcher nater 0
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    Typical reasons for shocking:
    Algae
    CC over 0.5
    Dead animal
    Pool Party, especially with kids (or inebriated adults)

    From the looks of your numbers, you probably don't need to shock. If you're not currently filtering/circulating the water, I wouldn't expect "crystal" clear at this point. Sounds like you'll be ready to swim as soon as it warms up!
    Nater
    16x32 Vinyl IG, 20,000 gal, Autopilot DIG-220 w/60 series cell, Dolphin Diagnostic Pool Boy

  4. #4
    ivyleager is offline Lifetime Member Weir Watcher ivyleager 0
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    149

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    Ditto. Last season, I only shocked twice...once after Memorial Day party with 25 guests (7 kids) and figured at least one peed in the pool. The other time was late season before closing. That's it. No need to shock if numbers are good.

    CaryB

  5. #5
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    I agree with everyone else. No need to shock. I didn't need to shock at all last year and maintained the water through the winter and will not shock to open this year as well. As long as CC <= 0.2, there's certainly no need to shock.

    The main reason to shock after a large pool party or when children are present isn't just in case CCs develop, but in case there is any sort of accident that might introduce more bacteria or overwhelming amounts of ammonia or other material into the pool. Even with a measurable CC, time and sunlight will likely break it down so shocking is mostly for expediency and extra safety after heavy bather load.

    Richard

  6. #6
    CarlD's Avatar
    CarlD is offline SuperMod Emeritus Vortex Adjuster CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Central NJ
    Posts
    6,607

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    Ditto.
    Shocking is a solution to a problem. If the problem doesn't exist, there's no need to shock. I personally shock in the Spring because I leave my pool untouched from mid-October to mid-April and all the Chlorine is gone...But I have a REASON to shock.

    If your chems are balanced and maintained there is no reason to shock just to shock.
    Carl

  7. #7
    Jakebear is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst Jakebear 0
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    76

    Default Re: To Shock ----- or NOT

    Thanks to all for your opinions, BUT......
    What about the dead worms that have been removed throughout the winter and how about the bird poop that ends up on the mesh cover and then it rains and migrates into the pool????

    Seems like this isn't much different than having a "solid" accident from a child which most of you have stated in the past-----"SHOCK, SHOCK, SHOCK, Better safe than sorry". "Kill the bacteria"!! Somehow I fail to see the difference.
    27038 Gallon InGround, Vinyl, DE filter.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Newbie: To shock or not to shock... That is the question
    By KaseyNewman in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 06-04-2011, 03:50 PM
  2. To shock or not to shock??
    By 94ukgrad in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-20-2010, 09:42 PM
  3. how much shock is too much?
    By can-opener in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 08-15-2006, 07:26 AM
  4. Shock and SWG
    By OffTheDeepEnd in forum Salt Generators (SWCG) & other Chlorine Feeders
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 07-06-2006, 08:46 PM
  5. To Shock or not to Shock
    By sartail in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-26-2006, 12:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts