+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    mohawk is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst mohawk 0
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    108

    Default 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    I've looked through the post here and on web sites and I'm not sure on how many solar panels we will need. We have a 30' rnd pool-not 27' like I thought earlier, it was a long winter. I want to run 2-4x20 panels side-by-side down the length of the deck. Do you think 2 would keep the water in the upper 80s ? Can you run the panels side-by-side(length to length) with ease or am I going to have alot of plumbing on the ground? Does this make sense to you-I'm not sure if I'm explaining it right.

  2. #2
    CarlD's Avatar
    CarlD is offline SuperMod Emeritus Vortex Adjuster CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Central NJ
    Posts
    6,607

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    Quote Originally Posted by mohawk View Post
    I've looked through the post here and on web sites and I'm not sure on how many solar panels we will need. We have a 30' rnd pool-not 27' like I thought earlier, it was a long winter. I want to run 2-4x20 panels side-by-side down the length of the deck. Do you think 2 would keep the water in the upper 80s ? Can you run the panels side-by-side(length to length) with ease or am I going to have alot of plumbing on the ground? Does this make sense to you-I'm not sure if I'm explaining it right.
    Let me see: 30' round is 707 square feet. I think you need at least one more panel.

    However, the good thing is you can put in 2 panels, see if they are enough, and, if not, add another. My parents had the same ratio of pool area to panels, only got 6 direct hours of sun a day and the water stayed in the low 80s. You'll need to keep the panels on the ground, because they will heat the ground, and then the ground will, after the sun passes, warm the water some more. Remember: As long as the water from the panels is even 1 degree warmer than the pool it's adding BTUs--heat energy. You'll also need to be good about using your solar cover when you aren't swimming.

    If you mean can you hook the panels in parallel rather than in series, the answer is not only "Yes" but that it's better that way. If all the water must first go through one panel, then the next, it sets up back pressure and makes your pump work harder. Your flow of water through the panels will be less, so it won't heat your pool as effectively. But in parallel, resistance will drop and more water will flow.

    A few years ago I split my system from strictly series (one panel after another) into 2 parallel systems. My water warmed up far faster because I got double the flow. It worked even better than I hoped!

    Remember: the more water you flow through your system, the warmer your pool will be. Basically, if your panels are cool to the touch on a blazing hot day, or at least don't burn you, they are doing their job efficiently.

    There are lots of technical reasons why TOO fast a flow loses efficiency, but for most people they really do best by moving as much water through their panels as they can. "Letting the water heat up" with a slower flow SEEMS to make sense, but, in fact, is wrong.

    Remember: the more BTUs you can add every hour, the more your pool will warm. It's not temperature--you just want the panel water warmer than the pool. A match burns at around 750-800 degrees but a 5 gallon bucket of 90 degree water will add FAR more heat energy to your pool than the match.
    Carl

  3. #3
    mohawk is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst mohawk 0
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    108

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    If I have them at a 45 angle, wouldn't that heat the water better than on the ground? The panels will face south west and will get direct sun most of the day. I was hoping for less panels cuz I still need to buy the solar reel which will run over $300.

  4. #4
    CarlD's Avatar
    CarlD is offline SuperMod Emeritus Vortex Adjuster CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Central NJ
    Posts
    6,607

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    Quote Originally Posted by mohawk View Post
    If I have them at a 45 angle, wouldn't that heat the water better than on the ground? The panels will face south west and will get direct sun most of the day. I was hoping for less panels cuz I still need to buy the solar reel which will run over $300.
    That depends on how they are exposed. If they are FULLY exposed to the sun, it doesn't matter if they are flat or angled. You only need to angle them if they don't get full sun otherwise. But the ground is your friend: It asks as a giant heat sink and storage device that allows you to continue to use your panels after the sun passes. Besides, a rack costs money as well. You can always add that if you need to.
    Last edited by CarlD; 04-17-2007 at 09:54 AM.
    Carl

  5. #5
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    If you are at a very northern latitude where the sun is not very directly overhead in the summer, then angling the panel will help. However, the effect is rather small until the sun is quite a ways away from being directly overhead (at noontime). The loss in heating goes as the cosine of the angle difference between the incidence of the sun and the perpendicular of the panel.

    For example, if the sun is 20 degrees away from directly overhead, then you get about 94% of what you would get if your panel were angled 20 degrees to "point at" the sun. If the sun is 40 degrees away from directly overhead, then you get about 77%. I'm ignoring any positive effect from ground heating that Carl mentioned and that may more than make up for the loss during the day.

    Richard
    Last edited by chem geek; 04-17-2007 at 03:33 PM.

  6. #6
    mas985's Avatar
    mas985 is offline Lifetime Member Whizbang Spinner mas985 3 stars mas985 3 stars mas985 3 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Pleasanton, CA
    Posts
    1,423

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    If you are the computer inclined, here is an application that can help you determine what your average temp is with and without solar. You can specify not only what direction the panels are but also, what type of material they are over (i.e. roof, ground etc.). It takes a bit of time to set up but it is better than a swag.

    http://www.canren.gc.ca/tech_appl/in...aId=5&PgID=484
    Mark
    Hydraulics 101; Pump Ed 101; Pump/Pool Spreadsheets; Pump Run Time Study; DIY Acid Dosing; DIY Cover Roller
    18'x36' 20k plaster, MaxFlo SP2303VSP, Aqualogic PS8 SWCG, 420 sq-ft Cartridge, Solar, 6 jet spa, 1 HP jet pump, 400k BTU NG Heater

  7. #7
    mohawk is offline Registered+ Thread Analyst mohawk 0
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    108

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    I think flat on the ground sounds good--now if only my brain would stop spinning. Denise

  8. #8
    CarlD's Avatar
    CarlD is offline SuperMod Emeritus Vortex Adjuster CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Central NJ
    Posts
    6,607

    Default Re: 2 Panels Instead Of 3?

    Mohawk,
    Unfortunately you inadvertently turned on one place where I like all the calculations--the old celestial navigation via sextant became a hobby of mine several years ago...usually I like to avoid the math and buzz words, but with that stuff I get like Chem_Geek!

    (first time I plotted my house's lat/long I cheerfully informed my wife the 1200' hill we lived on was 200 miles out to see! )


    But in more practical terms, my panels are perfectly flat--because they are also my pool deck. My strongest sun is still mid-day, but I get a lot of morning and late afternoon sun--they are aligned well for that. I don't get the ground effect but the water keeps my deck cool!

    Normally, the pool stores and solar companies say you need about half the surface area of your pool as panels--but I think that's only for very early spring and late fall. Otherwise in mid summer your water will hit 100! You are at the low end, just over 20% but I guarantee you can make a solid difference with that--been there, done it. I have about 35% of my surface area in panels, and that's more than enough--but I use a solar cover if it's going to cool off at all...and yes, I do have a reel for it.
    Carl

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Solar Panels
    By dhage in forum In-Ground Pool Construction and Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-18-2012, 10:57 PM
  2. two-speed with solar panels
    By semenzato in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 05-21-2007, 12:36 AM
  3. Solar Panels Q?
    By shanode in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-16-2007, 05:04 PM
  4. Quality of solar panels??
    By huskerfan in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-14-2007, 07:47 PM
  5. Solar Panels. Which one????
    By Dannyo in forum Pool Equipment & Operations
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 07-02-2006, 10:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts