Assuming that there was nothing wrong with the test for CH itself, the CH will rise if the plaster is curing since that releases calcium hydroxide into the water (it will also make the pH rise). If your plaster is more than one year old, then it is unlikely to still be curing (at least not that fast). If the CH rise was accurate and truly due to the curing of plaster, then you would have added 23 cups of Muriatic Acid to compensate for the very strong pH rise. I doubt very much that you've added anywhere near that amount of acid so I doubt the curing of plaster is the cause.
The other way that CH can rise is if your water chemistry is in a corrosive state with too little dissolved calcium carbonate. Your water is, in fact, slightly corrosive, but only a little bit (-0.3) and not nearly enough to cause etching or dissolving of the plaster at the rate of CH change you are seeing. If the CH rise was accurate and truly due to corrosion of plaster, then you would have added 23 cups of Muriatic Acid to compensate for the very strong pH rise (just as above for curing of plaster), but you would also have had to outgas a whole lot of carbon dioxide as well. Again, a very unlikely scenario.
Your TA is dropping because you are adding acid to maintain pH and the pH may be rising (until you add acid to lower it again) due to outgassing of carbon dioxide, but this does seem strange unless your water is getting aerated. I assume your SWG is off since the water is so cold (and you said you were adding bleach) and I assume you have waterfall or fountain features probably turned off or not running for very long. If your TA truly dropped 10 ppm (it could have been less since the test only resolves to 10 ppm for one drop), then the pH would have first risen from 7.6 to 8.67 due to carbon dioxide outgassing and you would add 2.9 cups of Muriatic Acid to restore the pH (of course, you would acid more frequently and not see the pH rise so much). That sounds a little closer to what is really going on except I suspect you added less acid and had less actual drop in TA. Of course, that only explains the TA and not the CH.
It is very unususal for the CH to rise so quickly. I would suspect that there is something about the test that is off a bit. Maybe it is sensitive to temperature -- the pool water is cold so let it get to room temperature before testing. With my own testing I used to get a "fading endpoint" which made the counts of the last drops difficult, but then read the instructions that said to add a few drops of titrant first before the calcium buffer and indicator solutions and that helped make the endpoint much more obvious and consistent.
So, bottom line, I don't have a good answer for you (but you know how I like to write...)
Richard
Bookmarks