Carl,
That's an excellent question (and I, too, look forward to hearing the answer) because normally the slightly corrosive water wouldn't be expected to dissolve calcium carbonate, but perhaps the extra physical erosion of a waterfall might accelerate that process. The problem is that the amount of calcium rise he is seeing is inconsistent with the amount of carbonate that must also be introduced and this should increase the TA and pH and require a lot more acid than is being added to have his TA actually drop from 80 to 70.
If I use the pool numbers given, then adding 7 ounces every other day for for 19 days is 8.3125 cups of 31.45% Muriatic Acid. I can then reproduce maintaining a pH of 7.6 and having the TA drop from 80 to 70 if I assume corrosion of calcium carbonate of 18.9 ppm and a large outgassing of carbon dioxide.
So SOME increase in calcium of around 20 ppm can be explained through corrosion, but not an increase of 70 ppm unless there is some strong acid somehow getting added to the pool (which I doubt -- beyond the Muriatic Acid, of course). I'm betting that the calcium test is off a bit, possibly due to temperature dependence and I'll be eager to see his new measurements.
Richard
Bookmarks