+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: tds bogus or true???????

  1. #21
    RavenNS is offline Established User Weir Watcher RavenNS Not to be trusted
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Nova Scotia CANADA
    Posts
    183

    Default Re: tds bogus or true???????

    Steve, that seems plausible to me ( that TDS is that high) given the early postings about salt water pools; but I'm not a chemist.
    It would be interesting to see what TDS you'd have if you weren't using a sodium based bromine.

    ( I wouldn't necessarily conclude that the TDS readings were false, I could guess that they are really high because of heavy salt)

    You certainly are giving your tub a thorough cleaning...lol

    (I wonder : Could the sodium be the ingredient that is bothering your burn, more so than the bromine?)
    Bromine usually helps skin conditions. not only did it help with the stuff that I mentioned before, but it helps with problems like psorisis too.
    - of course, salt can help with many infections as well...

    well, If you are happy with the tub water, then ignore the TDS ( as long as it doesn't void your warrenty)...
    otherwise, switch to a regular bromine & drain every three to four months (depending on the TDS)

    Good Luck
    Last edited by RavenNS; 08-17-2006 at 08:13 AM.

  2. #22
    turbottt1 Guest

    Default Re: tds bogus or true???????

    Since he may see it here, I'm putting it here: "turbottt1" has been moved in to a 'banned' group, the "Bad Email Address" group, because his email address is dead. I use that group to prevent accidental emails from being sent to dead addresses, among other things. When emails bounce back to me, I automatically move users into that group. -Ben


    Thank you for the cleaning adaboy.LOL! MY point to this thread is no one around here test with a meter. I've checked into them and wonder if this measement is worth the 350-400.00 investment in my own meter??? Thanks to the heads up by one of our members, I called and talked to one of the chemist who makes the product that we use. Thats when we discovered that it contains sodium bromide. As instructed weekly, I believe we have been overdosing on sodium bromide. Something we have been doing over the last 14 days is quite using our bromine and just using our shock [ 1oz.] after every use and once a week we shock with 3-4oz. Our taylor kit is not here yet, but our I believe oto[yellow] kit registers a level of between 3-5 ppm bromine. If I understand correctly with a two part system One part by itself does nothing and will not register on our kit. If my kit is showing 3-5ppm bromine than there must be bromine in the spa that our shock is reacting with???? I'm I correct??? steve
    Last edited by PoolDoc; 08-19-2006 at 08:17 AM.

  3. #23
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    70
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: tds bogus or true???????

    Steve,
    you are correct. ANY bromine based system needs sodium bromide in the water when the tub is initially filled. Tablets by themselves will NOT put enough bromine ions in the water to create a sufficient sanitizer level when the oxidiazer is added to the water for several weeks!
    RavenNS, If sodium is the problems then Steve would get the same burns from either soft water or going into the ocean. I am sorry, but your theory does not 'hold water'....so to speak.

    Once again I say TDS is a bogus measurement. In actual practice it means nothing. The main reason TDS came into use as a water parameter was NOT in bromine systems but in chlorine systems using stabilized chlorine. When trichlor and dichlor are used over a period of time TDS will rise (as it will with unstabilized chlorine) but so will the CYA (stabilziers). The vested intersts (manufacturers of stabilized chlorine and the pool stores that sell it) didn't want people to realize that the problems they were having with their pools was caused by the pools having too much CYA from continued use of stabilzied chlorine so TDS became the scapegoat and the reason they had to drain and refill. (Of course the problem is NOT our stabilzied chlorine tabs that you are using...its the TDS in the water! Your CYA level of 200 ppm is not the reason your chorine is not keeping the algae out of your pool...it's the TDS of 3000 ppm. It's not the high CYA that is causing the pitting of your plaster finish....it's the high TDS.) EVERY problems attributed to high TDS is KNOWN to be caused by overstabilization yet pools that have very high TDS (sometimes in excess of 6000 ppm) but are not overstabilized exhibit NONE of these problems....every pool with a SWG is a prime example!

    Now if you would care to discuss the Langelier Saturation index (another bogus measurement)...

    Also, bromine is a known sensitizer and many people have reactions from it. That is one of it's big downsides. I would like to know where you got the information that bromine helps skin coditions? If it is from the antibacterial effect then chlorine is equaly effective. In fact, chlorine is a more effective sanitizer than bromine. A FC level of 3 ppm is equivalent to a bromine level of 6.75 ppm!
    Last edited by waterbear; 08-17-2006 at 10:54 PM.
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

  4. #24
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    65
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: tds bogus or true???????

    I would just like to respond to the earlier question about getting a TDS meter for home use. I suspect this isn't a great idea, though it's probably easier to get a reliable and relatively inexpensive TDS meter than it is to get an ORP sensor. TDS is most often measured by conductivity. This has several problems, however. First of all, it doesn't measure anything that isn't charged, so neutral dissolved solids aren't measured. Second, you have to plug in numbers into formulas for roughly what is already known to be in the water (CH, TA, etc.) since the conductivity measurement doesn't tell you the "weight" of the solid and "ppm" is a weight measurement. Finally, conductivity measurements are affected by the size of the charge, so an ion with a charge of 2 registers 4 times as much as an ion with a charge of 1 (a charge of 3 registers 9 times -- yes, it's the square of the charge that gets measured) so if you don't know what's in your water composing TDS, you're measurement will be bogus (probably too high).

    So, bottom line, to the degree you already know a lot about what is in your pool or spa, then you have a chance of figuring out your TDS. The fact is that you can probably add it up yourself from the CH, TA, CYA, and salt (NaCl) (and maybe borates/boric acid if you use Borax). If you stick with BBB, then you won't have other junk including sulfates in your pool. Now with a hot tub that's using bromine and fragrances and all this other stuff, I personally think it's just better to change the water frequently regardless of TDS. As waterbear says, TDS is not particularly useful to know as a single total number -- it's the components that are important and there is no way of knowing if extra junk causing high TDS is a problem or not. If it's just plain salt, it's clearly not a problem.

    I have TDS in my spreadsheet and it influences the boo-hoo'd saturation index (it's not so much that it's bogus, but that it's over-emphasized and I've improved upon it anyway ), but what is more useful is to know how much specific chloride ion there is, and sulfates, etc. since these influence things such as chlorine outgassing that are much more relevant and useful (though very hard to predict with accuracy).

    Consider the following. If we can figure out why the pH rises in so many pools (both SWCG and non-SWCG) and can come up with something simple like keeping TA at 80 or 60 or something like that, then that will save a LOT on chemicals (acid) and will help keep down TDS as well.

    Bottom line, save your money and try to focus on keeping things simple. Using BBB will significantly reduce the extra stuff that is in most pools -- clarifiers, KMPS shock (lots and lots of sulfate in that one), defoamers, enzymatic cleansers, sequestering agents, algicide, etc. etc.

    Richard

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Fix a Leak - is it too good to be true?
    By wishIcould in forum In-Ground Pool Construction and Repair
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-29-2013, 12:45 PM
  2. CMU true 'Olympic sized' pool and pump room
    By mavswimmer in forum Photo Gallery
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-17-2012, 07:42 PM
  3. Is it true? Stockings in skimmer can filter algae?
    By NullQwerty in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-30-2006, 09:57 PM
  4. Oval install & owner horror stories true?
    By NWMNMom in forum Above-Ground Pool Construction & Repair
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 11:12 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts