Quote Originally Posted by mas985
Last week I raised my CYA from 30 to about 55. After a week of running with the higher CYA, I have come to the conclusion that it had no affect on my residual chlorine level. During this week I did not change my pump run time or the chlorinator setting. Also, pool temp and PH where about the same.

CL = 2 ppm @ CYA 30 ppm
CL = 2 ppm @ CYA 55 ppm

So the graphs from the CYA study are correct in that chlorine retention does not increase significantly for CYA levels more than 25 ppm even for a SWG pool.
but you are still not within the recommend range of 60-80 ppm. Try raising it up to 70 ppm and see what happens. I find that I lose chlorine quickly when my CYA is below 60 ppm and even 60 is iffy.
One other question. Assuming the same residual, is a SWG any different than an ORP controller with liquid chlorine? Both would need to add chlorine to the pool at the same rate for the same residual. To me at least, once you get past the chlorine injection method, there is no difference. Therefore, why should the CYA levels be any different?
Because the FC levels in the cell when the cell is generating are VERY high. It is not just shock level...more like 'supershock' level. The level is much higher than can be achieved by manual chlorination!
Also, the argument about shocking in the cell for SWGs also applies to the liquid chlorine. The chlorine concentrations would be just as high near the injection point.
No, it would be MUCH higher with a SWG which is generating chlorine gas which then dissovles in the water to form hypochorous acid. If you had an automated chorine gas injection system that was introducing the gas into a very small chamber of water (the size of a generator cell) it might be similar but a dosing pump with liquid chlorine will not reach the same concentrations nor will it come close.

Sorry for keeping the debate going but there seems to be a lot of conflicting information, theories and experimental results.
Hope this helps.