+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 51

Thread: Nature 2?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Lenny is offline Lifetime Member Thread Analyst Lenny 0
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Wilmington, Delaware
    Posts
    90

    Default

    I'm not going to use my Nature2 and I might remove the unit at some point, but for now I'm just letting it run without a filter. This won't hurt anything.

  2. #2
    CarlD's Avatar
    CarlD is offline SuperMod Emeritus Vortex Adjuster CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars CarlD 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    North Central NJ
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    I keep adding up the costs vs. the benefits and I just see N2 as a waste of money and potentially a problem.

    If you can run the unit without the cartridge without it leaking, then it should have no effect on the pool and you won't need to cut it out of the system.

    But, as I've repeated, $90 per season for a cartridge buys a LOT of bleach!--not to mention it will buy 6 or more quarts of Polyquat--MORE than enough for a season!
    Carl

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Nature 2?

    This post is very much in favor of the Nature2 cartridge. We have used one for the past 5 seasons. Our pool stays crystal clear and I hardly ever have to shock (every 4-6 weeks). All I have to do is use 2 stingy sticks every 5 days. The main reason for wanting less chemicals is my skin. I have psoriasis and very dry skin. This has helped my skin tremendously. If you start reading about how harmful chlorine is to your skin and how it is absorbed in your body you might decide to take an alternatate route and use less. As long as we have a pool I will gladly spend 100.00 at the beginning of the season. Minimal maintenance and more pool time is wonderful.

    Kim

  4. #4
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: Nature 2?

    Quote Originally Posted by poolmama63
    This post is very much in favor of the Nature2 cartridge. We have used one for the past 5 seasons. Our pool stays crystal clear and I hardly ever have to shock (every 4-6 weeks). All I have to do is use 2 stingy sticks every 5 days. The main reason for wanting less chemicals is my skin. I have psoriasis and very dry skin. This has helped my skin tremendously. If you start reading about how harmful chlorine is to your skin and how it is absorbed in your body you might decide to take an alternatate route and use less. As long as we have a pool I will gladly spend 100.00 at the beginning of the season. Minimal maintenance and more pool time is wonderful.

    Kim
    you might have less chlorine but you are subjecting yourself to both copper and silver so you are not really limiting yourself to exposure to chemicals! Both copper and silver can have negative health effects too. However, I work part time in a pool store and we regularly test for copper (LaMotte colorimeter that supposedly will read .01 ppm copper) and have several customers with Nature2 units. The copper test show no copper to about .03 ppm in the water which makes me wonder if the unit is really doing any thing. Biggest problem I have seen with these units is people let their FC levels drop well below the recommended .5 ppm and that means that the water does not have enough residual sanitizer and is not safe! Clear water is not necessisarily safe to swim in. I tested 3 Nature2 systems yesterday that had NO chlorine in their pools at all. IMHO, this is a bigger concern about whether the water is safe to swim in than how much the cartridge costs to replace or if it is effective. It seems (from my limited experience) to give a false sense of security about pool maintenance and very little margin for error.
    Last edited by waterbear; 04-30-2006 at 02:33 PM.
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2

    Default Re: Nature 2?

    when our water is tested it always comes up with trace amounts of copper, making me think the nature2 is working. Anyway, personally I would prefer to deal with copper than itchy burning skin and red irritated eyes from chlorine.
    All a personal choice I suppose.

    Thanks,
    Kim

  6. #6
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: Nature 2?

    the 'itchy burning skin and red irritated eyes" is NOT from a properly maintained chlorine pool. It is caused by chloramines in an improperly maintained pool. Thank you for reinforcing what I said about a false sense of security about pool maintenance in my previous post.
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. How does my Nature 2 fit in this puzzle?
    By Penuche in forum Dealing with Stains & Metals, . . . and 'Minerals' & 'Ions',
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-03-2013, 04:15 AM
  2. nature 2 and bbb
    By go pens in forum Pool Chemicals & Pool Water Problems
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-01-2011, 09:34 AM
  3. Nature 2 opinions
    By knarf#2 in forum Above-Ground Pool Construction & Repair
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 10:31 AM
  4. SWG & Nature 2
    By bbroglio in forum Salt Generators (SWCG) & other Chlorine Feeders
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 09:50 PM
  5. Nature 2?
    By milynor in forum Dealing with Algae & Slime
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-10-2006, 07:54 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts