
Originally Posted by
kevink619
Hi all,
My wife and I are seriously considering having an in ground pool installed. We've talked to three different contractors and have heard vastly differing opinions on the below items:
Salt system:
Two contractors say it's great - better for the skin, easier to take care of, etc. One recommended against it and says it causes heaters to blow up, "it's not good to have all that salt in the water", etc. Who's right? My wife has sensitive skin, so, if there are no major disadvantages to the salt system, it seems worth the $1300 price tag.
Usually, when a contractor is against something, it's because he doesn't know how to install it. SWGs are used by people all over this forum and almost all LOVE them. They CAN run pH up, so you have to add acid frequently. You CAN keep the salt level low enough so you don't taste it but high enough to work--remember, tears which SOOTH your eyes are salty. I think it's a good investment on a new pool.
Ozonator:
I currently have a portable spa with an ozonator and Nature2 and love it. Two dealers recommended ozonation for the pool, while one said "it's not really effective". Who's right?
IMHO, the latter. PoolDoc can give you myriad reasons why ozonators aren't effective unless they are set SO strongly that they are dangerous and require trained professional for operation.
Nature2 is, IMHO, nothing but hype to separate you from your money. Just think about it: N2 claims to cut UP TO half your chlorine usage. But every season you need new cartridge and they are now $105. That means you have to spend over $200 a season on chlorine for it to be worth it to use Nature2--that's a LOT of chlorine! N2 is a copper-silver erosion system that dumps negligible amounts into your water--not enough to be effective. Nature2 has STUDIOUSLY avoided saying how the device works, or producing any real study that can be subjected to the scholar's standard: Peer Review.
Two-speed pump:
Here in San Diego, electricity is very expensive. I've heard that the two-speed pumps can really save on energy costs. Two dealers recommended the two-speed pump, and one said that they're a waste of money. We do plan on installing solar heating as well as a couple of "sheer descents" water features. Will the two-speed pump be pointless since the solar heating will (apparently) require that the pump run in the high-speed? What about the days in the summer where the water is already hot enough?
I have a 2 speed pump--a 1hp Hayward SuperPump for a 19,200 gallon pool. I run it on low almost ALL the time--and I have solar panels, too. I will NEVER own a single speed pump again.
Solar heating system:
The concept seems very basic - put some black plastic panels up on the roof and pump water through 'em so that the water soaks up the heat from the sun. Are the more expensive solar heating systems really that much better in efficiency, or will an inexpensive solar heating system be sufficient?
Unless you are planning a permanent system that faces "the elements", especially snow and ice, most of the more expensive rollable panels are merely more expensive. You are in San Diego--You will find solar INCREDIBLY effective. I have solar in North Central New Jersey and we LOVE it. We can start swimming in early May and go till mid to late September, easily now. Think how much better it will be for YOU!
If you are NOT going roof-top, rollable panels will work FINE for you. Poconos is more of an expert on all kinds of systems, including home-brew, than I am.
Thanks, in advance, to all that can provide some unbiased opinions on the above features.
Kevin K
Bookmarks