There's not enough traffic on PoolForum currently for you to have a reasonable chance of a decent new answer. Use the Super Search page to search BOTH PoolForum and TroubleFreePool. An old answer is as good as a new one, since there has not been much (any?) innovation in pool cleaners, and since even if there WAS something genuinely new, it is always a BAD idea to serve as a new product tester for the pool industry!
(Keep in mind that the Super Search page doesn't search directly, but just creates a link for a special focused Google search. Don't use it more than 8x in 30 minutes, since Google interprets frequent use of their own "advanced search operators" as hacker activity.)
That said, I'm not sure that any non-robotic cleaner will outperform a properly adjusted Polaris 180/280/380 series. Of course, proper adjustment is a PITA, that even many service guys can't get right. And . . . I'm not sure any non-robotic cleaner will work perfectly in a large pool with a complicated profile. To some degree, it's a price you pay for 'getting fancy'.
Here's a general rule for pools that folks don't like hearing but it's still true: the more complicated a pool -- in any parameter [ surface, layout, features, controls, etc ] the LESS likely it is that it will work well. A local pool service guy, who cleans and maintains home pools that are mostly in the $100,000+ range tells me that NONE of his customer's really expensive pools work well!
Good luck!
Bookmarks