Dave, did you see Ben's post above?
Dave, did you see Ben's post above?
@Watermom: No I hadn't, thanks for pointing it out - more simul-post.
I stand by my assertion that this is a case where our regular advice of one scoop is enough may be breaking down.
While the sample is too small for statistical scrutiny, mary jo's results are consistent and exceed the error of the test. 2ppm (4 drops) more FC was measured in each session. It's also worth mention that the measured CC was consistently 0.5ppm lower although this is in the error of the test. I am hesitant to ascribe this variance to testing error or bias (despite mary jo's assertion of rookie status) as she has performed these tests more often in the last month than most of us will in a season and that, while not blinded to the test, she wasn't aware of the expected outcome.
I think this is important as we start to guide people to HiC2 operation. 30ppm FC is beyond the limit of the test and Taylor suggests adding more DPD powder to accomodate.
Bookmarks