Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Bartier Disinfection Index

Threaded View

  1. #18
    chem geek is offline PF Supporter Whibble Konker chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars chem geek 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    California
    Age
    66
    Posts
    2,226

    Default Re: Bartier Disinfection Index

    Quote Originally Posted by waterbear
    My understanding is that the 650 mv is an arbitrary selection and have not been able to find anything that explains why this 'magic number' is the level at which sanitation occurs. It is interesting that in a 2005 CPO training handbook that I have seen it talks about 850 mv as being the level of adequite sanitation.
    Take a look at page 5 of the following link:

    http://www.sbcontrol.com/ppmorp.pdf

    The "Commercial Spas Study, Portland, Oregon" shows how the 650 mV ORP cutoff is reasonable for sanitation -- at least for the types of bugs found in those particular spas. There are clearly some bugs that require much higher concentrations of chlorine to get killed, but most bugs die below the 650 mV llevel. On the other hand, I found that the concentration of HOCl was at least as good if not a little better than ORP. I will put this information into the "Pool Water Chemistry" thread so you can see it.

    You may also be interested in the following link that gives CT (C for concentration in ppm chlorine and T for time in minutes) values for various pathogens, though the focus is mostly on the ones that are hard to kill (for water treatment). The "easy" bugs (those easier than E. Coli) are not listed. Note that kill time is shortened at higher temperatures and the temps given are rather low.

    http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_...treatpath3.pdf
    http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8149.pdf

    On the other hand, bacterial biofilms may require much more chlorine than is ever found in pools, even with shocking without CYA:

    http://www.edstrom.com/Resources.cfm?doc_id=145

    Quote Originally Posted by waterbear
    My understanding is that the algae will actually consume this as a food source as they consume other nitrogeneous compounds, hence the greater effectiveness.
    I see you said that in your earlier post. Sorry I missed that the first time. If we try to use monochloramines for killing algae, then that will be a tricky combination of adding chlorine and ammonia. If CYA is present, then after the algae is killed, it will be virtually impossible to shock to breakpoint to get rid of the monochloramine, though it's possible a non-chlorine shock could do the trick.

    Thanks for your comments. They are helpful.

    Richard
    Last edited by chem geek; 07-17-2006 at 06:52 PM. Reason: Added another reference (link to U.C. Davis document)

Similar Threads

  1. Saturation Index
    By Charlie in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-11-2011, 10:39 AM
  2. Saturation Index
    By DONNIE in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-16-2007, 01:40 PM
  3. Disinfection Rates and Minimum Chlorine Levels
    By chem geek in forum The China Shop
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-06-2007, 02:53 PM
  4. Bartier Disinfection Index
    By smallpooldad in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-05-2006, 08:27 AM
  5. Hamilton Index and iron
    By smallpooldad in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-02-2006, 10:17 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts