+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: B.B.B with the N2

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Mahwah, NJ, USA.
    Posts
    84

    Default Re: B.B.B with the N2

    I had N2 that I bought when the pool was installed last year (before I found this site). The warning about not using BBB with N2 relates to the potential addition of copper by N2 which could cause a problem. The general belief - but not proven - is that N2 does so little it does not negatively impact BBB. But since not proven buyer beware.

    I removed my cartridge within 2 months of use and had no negative impact using BBB. My suggestion would be to do the same and just go with BBB. The main risk I see with N2 is the suggestion you can maintain your pool using lower free chlorine levels than recommended here. That would be dangerous.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Morris, IL
    Posts
    354

    Default Re: B.B.B with the N2

    That is sort of what I am seeing, a lower chlorine content appears to impact sanitation. This stinks, I purchased it like four days ago.

  3. #3
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: B.B.B with the N2

    It is interesting that in Australia they regulate copper/silver ionizations systems much more closely than they do here in the U.S.
    http://www.apvma.gov.au/qa/poolspa_FAQ_May2005.shtml

    Draw your own conclusions about the safety of ionizers (we all KNOW how well the EPA 'protects' us in the U.S.! )
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

+ Reply to Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts