+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Is stabilizer necessary?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    751

    Default Is stabilizer necessary?

    I was reading this link ( http://www.truetex.com/poolcontrol.htm#cyanurics ), and the section titled "Eliminating Cyanurics" caught my attention. According to this article, stabilizer isn't needed and in fact makes it much more difficult to sanitize the pool and extremely difficult/impossible to kill algae without having to shock on a regular basis.

    He states he does not use stabilizer and can sanitize/kill algae with far lower free chlorine levels (well less than 1ppm; I think he mentions .2ppm or so). It seems unstabilized chlorine is extremely effective even at low levels.

    Has anyone tried this method? Can it be done when using a SWG (mine recommends CYA at 60-80, would a CYA level of 0 hurt it?)?

    I understand CYA prevents UV from depleting the chlorine quickly, but also greatly reduces its effectiveness. Would a SWG be able to keep up with demand without using any CYA or prematurely depleting the cell?

    Seems like this method could save quite a bit of $$. Any thoughts/experience with this are greatly appreciated.

  2. #2
    BigDave's Avatar
    BigDave is offline Lifetime Member Whizbang Spinner BigDave 3 stars BigDave 3 stars BigDave 3 stars
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,932

    Default Re: Is stabilizer necessary?

    Yes, it is in an outdoor pool. Please read through this thread which contains a discussion of the need for stabilizer.

    I've read the pool automation website and I think it's a pretty neat project but essentially misguided.

    Feel free to post back here after looking over the thread above if you have any questions or if something is unclear, I didn't reread the entire thread today so...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    751

    Default Re: Is stabilizer necessary?

    Thanks for the link.

    I read through that thread but was left even more confused. I really didn't see anything in that thread that discussed the need/benefits for using CYA and why it's better to use it than not. The focus of the thread seems to be on Kent Williams and the disagreement with his recommendations and how some here do not like him. But the link I posted was written by Richard Kinch. In the thread you mentioned Ben/PoolDoc says this:

    "...Richard knows more about the chemical relationships among chlorinated cyanurates in pools than anyone I know . . "

    Is he talking about the same Richard? If so, then I'm really confused as Richard seems to be advocating not using CYA.

    As I'm certainly FAR from being and expert (just a pool owner who's trying to learn how properly to take care my pool without wasting a bunch of time and money on it) I would greatly appreciate some guidance and clarity.

    Thanks.

    PS - If it matters, I have an outdoor IG 20k gal. vinyl pool with an Aquarite SWG and Hayward DE6020 DE filter.

  4. #4
    BigDave's Avatar
    BigDave is offline Lifetime Member Whizbang Spinner BigDave 3 stars BigDave 3 stars BigDave 3 stars
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,932

    Default Re: Is stabilizer necessary?

    Jim,
    I'm sorry, I didn't choose the best example in the thread I referenced. My bad. There are better discussions here on Pool Forum.
    The important thing to understand is: in a stabilized pool, more chlorine is available where it needs to be to destroy pathogens that enter the water.
    Stabilizer binds a percentage (a large percentage but not all) of the Free Chlorine, this protects the chlorine from the sun but also prevents it from sanitizing the water. This applies only to the bound chlorine which is a portion of the Free chlorine. When the portion of the unbound chlorine is used up reducing some "dirt" that gets in the pool, the stabilizer releases bound chlorine to become unbound chlorine and maintain the portion of unbound chlorine to bound chlorine. This newly unbound chlorine is immediately available to attack more "dirt" in the place where the dirt is.
    On the other hand, in a pool with no stabilizer, all the Free Chlorine is available to attack the "dirt" but when the supply of chlorine in the immediate vicintity of the "dirt" is exhausted, the remaining "dirt" won't be sanitized until circulation and dispersion bring more chlorine close enough to it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    751

    Default Re: Is stabilizer necessary?

    Thanks Dave. That information is helpful. So bottom line, I should stick with the CYA levels recommended by the manufacturer of my SWG?

    Some info for reference.....

    One reason this topic caught my attention is my personal experience over the past several years dealing with algae in my pool (my pool was installed in the spring of 2004 and it's the only pool I've ever owned). It seems despite keeping CYA in the 60-80 range, FC 5-7, and PH 7.5-7.6, the liner would keep getting slick (start of an algae breakout?) and I would have to shock and brush the pool frequently. Based on a recommendation a few years ago, I started using borax (maintained at 40-50) and polyquat 60 (I add a maintenance dose of 8 oz per week). Since doing this in combination of shocking every couple of weeks, I no longer have an issue with a slick liner. However, I do still get some visible algae in grooves and crevices (such as where the liner meets the steps and behind the trim around the pool light; possibly due to poor circulation in those areas?) which I'll brush out before my regular shock treatment.

    I'm tempted to discontinue the polyquat 60 to see what happens. That would save me a couple hundred dollars a season, but I'm hesitate to mess with what's currently working well for me. Except for the addition of polyquat 60 and Jack's Magic Purple Stuff (since using this I have no more staining issues which I'm told is a side effect of the SWG), I pretty much follow the BBB method.

    BTW, except for a few spring openings when I was using a mesh cover over the winter (I use a solid cover now), my pool have never been green (during the season it's always clear).
    Last edited by JimK; 05-17-2012 at 08:32 PM.

  6. #6
    Watermom's Avatar
    Watermom is offline SuperMod Emeritus Quark Inspector Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars Watermom 4 stars
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    Posts
    9,345

  7. #7
    waterbear's Avatar
    waterbear is offline Lifetime Member Sniggle Mechanic waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars waterbear 4 stars
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    St. Augustine, Fl
    Age
    71
    Posts
    3,743

    Default Re: Is stabilizer necessary?

    Quote Originally Posted by JimK View Post

    One reason this topic caught my attention is my personal experience over the past several years dealing with algae in my pool (my pool was installed in the spring of 2004 and it's the only pool I've ever owned). It seems despite keeping CYA in the 60-80 range, FC 5-7, and PH 7.5-7.6, the liner would keep getting slick (start of an algae breakout?) and I would have to shock and brush the pool frequently. Based on a recommendation a few years ago, I started using borax (maintained at 40-50) and polyquat 60 (I add a maintenance dose of 8 oz per week). Since doing this in combination of shocking every couple of weeks, I no longer have an issue with a slick liner. However, I do still get some visible algae in grooves and crevices (such as where the liner meets the steps and behind the trim around the pool light; possibly due to poor circulation in those areas?) which I'll brush out before my regular shock treatment.

    I'm tempted to discontinue the polyquat 60 to see what happens. That would save me a couple hundred dollars a season, but I'm hesitate to mess with what's currently working well for me. Except for the addition of polyquat 60 and Jack's Magic Purple Stuff (since using this I have no more staining issues which I'm told is a side effect of the SWG), I pretty much follow the BBB method.

    BTW, except for a few spring openings when I was using a mesh cover over the winter (I use a solid cover now), my pool have never been green (during the season it's always clear).
    Sounds like a circulation problem, although I have another suspicion as to what might be going on and adding to the problem. A few questions:
    How many hours do you run the pump a day?
    One speed or two speed pump?
    How many returns, skimmers, etc?
    Which cell are you using with your Aquarite, T-3, T-9, or T-15?
    What output percentage is the Aquarite normally set on?
    What are you using to test the water and how often do you test?
    How often do you brush your pool?
    Do you have an automatic pool cleaner? If so which one and how often do you run it?
    How often do you vacuum your pool?
    How often do you backwash the filter and do you retest the water after topping it off and adjust chemical levels again if needed?
    What are you shocking with (the SWCG or with manual addition of a chemical) and it is after or before backwashing?

    FWIW, you should run your CYA at 80 ppm with the AquaRite. I indirectly helps with pH control since you can run the cell at a lower output to maintain the same FC which means less production of hydrogen bubbles in the cell which means less aeration of the water which means less outgassing of CO2 and outgassing of CO2 is the main cause of pH rise in a pool.

    Using both borate at 50 ppm and polyquat is probably overkill and personally I am a big fan of borate and have actively promoted its use for several years now.

    Getting back to your pool problem...IF you have pool circulation in some areas then algae might start growing even if you are doing everything right. Running with no CYA is NOT going to solve the problem and could even make it worse. The best way to solve the problem is to brush the pool on a regular basis. You want to brush down the sides of the pool all the way around. This sets up currents that 'stir up' the water in the pool and help eliminate dead spots. Most people do not brush their pools often enough, many do not brush the entire pool but only areas that have algae or dirt, and some pools just need more brushing than others to keep them clean.
    Retired pool store and commercial pool maintenance guy.

+ Reply to Thread

Similar Threads

  1. Stabilizer
    By cooper in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-30-2011, 09:26 PM
  2. Stabilizer
    By Sue225 in forum Pool Chemicals & Pool Water Problems
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-12-2011, 12:22 AM
  3. Stabilizer
    By Calcutta in forum Testing and Adjusting Pool Water Chemistry
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 03-26-2008, 10:31 PM
  4. Stabilizer
    By mackeeg in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-17-2007, 12:16 PM
  5. HTH Stabilizer
    By let_her_flicker in forum Using Chlorine and Chlorinating Chemicals
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-20-2006, 06:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts