Heater Failures

[PoolDoc]

When you take pics, it would be VERY informative to have detailed and careful photos of both the INTERIOR and the exterior of the heat exchangers.

Ben

[CarlD]

Hi, APL:

Your assurances of "balance" raise some questions for me.
If the numbers you are citing now are the same ones you had when you were using your SWCG, then that may be one of the sources of your problems.
Ben's knowledge of pump HP and flow rates is far beyond mine so I'm just going to look at the chemistry. It may well be you are simply blasting too much water through your heaters and that is the cause of failure. I don't know.

Back to the chems.
FC: 1.5
CYA: 20
TA: 85

I'm not the SWCG expert but I do know that every manufacturer recommends a relatively CYA level of something like 70-90ppm
At those levels, FC should be no less than 5% (so CYA=80, FC >= 4ppm).
Also, a rising pH can mean your TA is too high. For years we were taught TA should be 90-120, with some scales going from 80-125. But we've been finding out experientially that this is not necessarily true. For example: All this season my TA has been a startlingly low level of 60-70ppm. WELL below "standard". Yet my pH has been MORE stable this season than it ever has been. What seems to be the REAL case is that pools with rising pH tend to be "happier" with lower TA levels. In fact, for SWCG pools, our resident experts ALWAYS recommend lower TA levels. Still, also it's well-known that many SWCG owners face continual rising pH.

What also concerns me (and I may WELL be off-track here) is that your continual acid feed may not dilute properly by the time it reaches the heater...if so, the problem is pretty straight forward. Have you ever considered testing water (somehow) just before it enters the heater to see if its pH is low?

So, I'm guessing you have a number of potential causes of your regular heater failure.

These are just some thoughts.

Carl

[apoollover]

Hi Carl,

Thanks for the reply, and great feedback. So, what are we supposed to do? The heater manufacturers all give you the levels they want you to have, and NONE of them tell you to have a FC level above 3. Yet, they do recommend CYA at, I believe, 70. And, going off Ben's guide, a CYA of 70 equates to an FC level of between 5 and 10. If a manufacturer saw that you had those levels, they would immediately point to the water being too corrosive. Plus, and I'd have to go look at the "wheel", but I think that would create other problems when looking at Taylor's water balance wheel?

My pH has continued to rise even after I stopped using the SWG, to my surprise. Not really sure why that would be. Regarding your concern of the acid feeder, I have to dilute the acid in the tank anyway so that the pool pH stays consistent. Plus, it feeds just outside of the filter tank on the return to the pool, so the higher acid level in the tank gets diluted before it returns to the heaters (i.e. only pool water hits the heaters). Plus, we had a majority of our heater failures before we put the acid feeder in. I only put the acid feeder in for convenience and to try to maintain a more consistent pH, rather than adding multiple cups every day or two.

So, maybe, from your feedback, the question is: by following the manufacturer recommended chemistry levels, am I actually creating the problem? I'm not a chemist, but intuitively, it seems to me like having higher FC, lower TA, and higher CYA would make the water more corrosive to heaters?

Ben, I'll try and get photos of the heat exchangers when the tech brings them back. He was going to call Raypak to talk to them, and then ship them back using the boxes from the new exchangers, which are at my house....

By the way, Ben, for flow-purposes, I have 3 skimmers, and two main-drains. The pool is only 6.5 feet at its deepest (not sure if that makes any difference).