In the 4 years or so that I have read the threads here, I can't count how many times newbies and veterans alike get into trouble with CYA levels. A question that has always been in the back of my mind is, why do we even bother using stabilizer in the first place? The common knowledge is that it protects the FC from being eaten by sunlight, and that by using it will save us the problem of 0ppm FC levels. If one tests their pool on a daily basis, like most here do, I would think that one would notice a low FC level and immediately correct it by adding more Chlorine. This, to me would eliminate the need for stabilizer. The problems this product causes seem to outweigh it's benefits. Chem Geek has graced us with his knowledge of these things. CYA inhibits FC's job of oxidation. Why would we use a product that effectively would strangle chlorine, just so the chlorine would be there after a days worth of sunshine? It just doesn't make sense to me anymore.
My pool, for example, under trees, is only in direct sunlight maybe 2 hours out of the day. We also swim in it almost on a daily basis. So, I can't help but wonder if the FC I lose periodically is due to swimmer load, or sunlight. I can never know, because I have always had CYA in the pool. I may not even need CYA since I'm only getting a few hours of sun. Since I have to keep a higher FC because the stabilizer is in there, it could be costing me more $ in the long run. I could be keeping a 1-3 ppm FC with 0 CYA, as opposed to the 6ppm I shoot for now with my 40 CYA. That first 1-3 ppm that's being held in a headlock could be free and ready for the battle, should it arise.![]()
So here's the deal. Next season we are having a new liner installed. Since a full drain/refill will be done in the spring, I think I'm gonna try no stabilizer. I realize it's ways off yet, but it's something that has always bugged me, and I want to try it. I will, of course, post here my thoughts and results.
Thanks for bearing with my sort of rant lol
Cheers,
Ken
Bookmarks