The store tech pipetted the water samples into sealed rectangular shaped vials that must have contained reagents (I'm not sure if they were liquid or dry) and then she took the reading off the colorimeter.
Printable View
Thank you, Richard. Unfortunately, I haven't found yet on the board a sticky that deals with these questions.
Here's are some further questions:
1. Suppose the CC is > 0.5 and there's no algae condition. Do I still need to use the "Ben's Table" , or should I use the 10x CC rule? I'm asking because with my CYA level of 56 , the 20 ppm FC level off the Table seems high. How long would it take for the FC to dissipiate and thus enabling a safe for swimming level of FC?
2. If CYA is stable, as I've read here, and since it protects FC from UV, then how come it is still mentioned here in many places that one should shock in the evening, otherwise the FC will be quickly destroyed by the Sun's UV?
3. I'm sure that no such thing as "average bather load" is accurately defined, and that other bio-enviromental factors are involved, but, what frequency can I expect of FC addition in order to mainatin my normal FC level? Is it daily, or twice a week, or what?
4. What's the best thing to do when one goes on a 1- 2 week vacation and the pool is left unattended?
Shock before you leave? Add trichlor tablets?
Please let me know if a FAQ answering all these questions and other, related ones is posted here or elsewhere. If not, I'm sure it would be very helpful and would save a lot of time and bandwidth.
Ok, That would be a LaMotte Waterlink or Waterlink Express. It's a pretty good system. We use the same at work. I will warn you that the TA test often reads low and so does the calcium hardness. It has to do with the limitations of the meter so if your Taylor test reads higher on these believe it.
My Taylor kit is supposed to arrive any day now.
Is the test's chem based on titration? Does it offer an accurate reading?
Thank you again, Richard, for this detailed response.
I understand that it's beyond the scope of this part of the forum, but I'd be interested to see the chemical details of the correlation between CYA level and the amount of FC needed to shock. You mentioned before a paper presented long time ago. Has anything been published so far on line?
Also, it's not easy to understand why such a high level of FC is needed to break 0.5 - 1 ppm CC in an alagae-free shock treatment. In my case it's 19.8 FC (CYA =50), taken from the table you posted at troublefreepools.com. Is it because of the fact that in the presence of CYA, "free" HOCl doesn't exist, but it's rather bound to CYA?
If we need to move on to the China Shop for this purpose, please let me know.
Continuing in the China Shop in this thread.
Got my Taylor k-2006 kit today! Impressive and worth the price! (got it from SPS -Swimming Pool Supply Company -good price and prompt shipping).
The pool (actually the "swamp") was opened last Friday.
Now it's sparkling blue, after performing the "usual" green pool routine (*) and lots of POPP.
Here are the numbers:
CYA 60
FC 7.5
CC < 0.5
TA 140
pH 7.9
CH 170
I followed your advice and started to take care of the pH and alkalinity. Since I have in stock "dry acid" I added half the calculated amount needed to bring it to pH 7.6.
I used 1 lb. One thing I learned here - slow down with adding chemicals!
I wonder where can I get muriatic acid. Home Depot doesn't carry it. Hydrochloric Acid (the actual compound) is cheap - I wonder if chemical supply houses sell it to residential end users.
(*) the "green pool routine" I used : shocked to 20 ppm first day and on day three, frequent backwashes, brushing, vacuuming, floc, robot cleaner.
It goes without saying that with 60 ppm CYA this pool won't see chlor tabs any more!
Any other suggestions?